Letting Gays Adopt Children Research Paper Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1750 words

Letting Gays Adopt Children - Research Paper Example The concluding portion would highlight the supporting arguments favoring same sex couples to adopt and raise children as their own. Letting Gays Adopt Children: Final Draft One of the most controversial issues in contemporary times is focused on homosexuality in terms of allowing same sex marriages and allowing same sex spouses to adopt children. The significance of the issue is seen in terms of supporting basic human rights pursuant to the principles of American democracy and several researches that validate the fact that children could be holistically raised by same sex couples. Chrisler (2010) cited some relevant statistics from the UCLA's Williams Institute that discloses the number of gay partners, totaling about 1 million, to have raised more than 2 million children. The American Academy of Pediatrics revealed the findings that â€Å"no data have pointed to any risk to children of growing up in a family with one or more gay parents† (Laumann, 2002, p. 344). The current r esearch therefore aims to provide arguments that support allowing same sex couples to adopt children. The article published in The First Post entitled Pros and Cons: Gay Adoption (2007) presented relevant details that provide advantages and disadvantages of allowing same sex couples to adopt children. The article revealed that there are five distinct advantages ranging from: (1) the ability to give adopted children a more secure home; (2) two full time parents are more beneficial than single parents; (3) the option for artificial insemination to female gay parents have been proven to create raising well-balanced children; (4) barring gay parents from adoption is a discriminatory act; and (5) the shortage of adoptive parents make this alternative a better option than foster care system. As emphasized by Jost (2003), â€Å"same sex marriage advocates note that virtually all states permit – any many encourage – adoption of children by gay or lesbian parents because it he lps relieve the burdens on overcrowded and underfunded state foster-care systems† (p. 732). These advantages, therefore, give credence and support to same sex couples being more in an advantageous position in terms of providing holistic support to children than opting for foster care and giving the couples enhanced privilege for a stronger bond through the experience of raising children. After considering the benefits of allowing same sex couples to adopt children, the disadvantages are likewise presented to provide a balanced picture of the situation. The arguments against gay adoption have these following supportive statements: (1) the children’s need for role models for both sexes is not satisfied; (2) gay adoption is contrary to Christian teaching; and (3) society simply views gay parenting unconventional and wrong. These disadvantages stem from some researches that indicate that the traditional basic framework and ideal familial environment is that children need bi ological parents. Cultural norms and tradition have

Critical review on the movieThe lottery directed by Madeleine Sackler Movie

Critical on the movieThe lottery directed by Madeleine Sackler - Movie Review Example As per the film, the UFT fight to repossess the closed down building of a public school whose ownership changes to that of Harlem group of schools. In contrast, the UTF and the public view this move as one to degrade the public schools, which is not. A summary of the movie’s argument The film follows in the lives of four children namely Eric Jr., Ameenah, Greg Jr., and Christian whose backgrounds are seemingly different. The film portrays them as being the carriers of the ambitions and dreams of what their parents could not achieve in their hay days. The four children compete for the one opening available in the school. However, the events surrounding the schools closure give a twist to the whole story. A better part of the anti-charter schooling activists fight all through to lock out Harlem School from accessing public money. In addition, the closure of the public school draws the view that charter schools are better than those public schools. The film depicts the stakes on public education, as not all the stakeholders participate in deciding whether the Harlem Success School should possess the collapsed public school. The chances of winning these lotteries are relatively low, but the movie shows that it is worth trying their luck. The demands and hindrances posed by the teachers’ unions are a constant hurdle that public schools have to overcome. In essence, it makes the quality of learning in public schools to deteriorate. The argument brought out in this film is that they need not do away with public schools but should create more charter schools to benefit many. Sackler’s argument was that for her, she was not a politician but she only wanted to point out the real picture of the situation in the society. About the interview she had with Barry Weiss, the movie was not in any way political, as it did not take any political stand. It neither took sides nor did point accusing fingers at any one. She argues that the inspiration behind the f ilm was the number of disappointed parents she had witnessed during a lottery selection process. The need to ascertain why parents opted to undergo the risky fifty-fifty chance to acquire this chance for their children inspired her to do the film. Essentially, the movie’s argument was on why the chances to attend charter schools were necessary to many parents and children alike. Secondly, Sackler’s argument was that the future of public education was also at stake. According to Weiss, her stumbling upon a group of protesters protesting against the current state of the public schools inspired her into doing the film. The fact that UTF had paid Acorn to silence them over the advocacy of charter schools to public schools during the protest was also present in the film. As per her film, the level of bureaucracy in the public schools and the governing of public schools were detrimental to the children’s future. Therefore, her argument was that a broader look in to th e affairs of the teachers’ unions responsible for the running of public schools was a matter of importance. Her argument was if there were high ranked institutions that could accord high quality of education, and then why not create many others. Thirdly, Miss Sackler argues that many parents ignore what the charter school is about hence they just view it as a gateway to success for their children. In essence, she uses a deaf